Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the literature: The only difference here between a "chronological" and a "thematic" approach is what is emphasized the most: Write the review Start by writing your thesis statement.
Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study.
Take notes as you read and start to organise your review around themes and ideas. Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination.
The number of sources that you will be required to review will depend on what the literature review is for and how advanced you are in your studies. Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem.
Development of the Literature Review Four Stages 1. Methodological Review A review does not always focus on what someone said [findings], but how they came about saying what they say [method of analysis].
Writing the conclusion In the conclusion, you should: However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective.
Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: Structure of a literature review Introduction Your introduction should give an outline of why you are writing a review, and why the topic is important the scope of the review — what aspects of the topic will be discussed the criteria used for your literature selection e.
Your lecturer will advise you on these details. Conclude by providing some insight into the relationship between the central topic of the literature review and a larger area of study such as a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or a profession. At undergraduate level literature reviews can be a separate stand alone assessment.
For example, weave references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording.
On the other hand, a review in a thesis, dissertation, or journal article presenting original research usually leads to the research questions that will be addressed. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the primary studies.
Read the literature Critically read each source, look for the arguments presented rather than for facts.
First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. What are you searching the literature to discover. When you write your review, you should address these relationships and different categories and discuss relevant studies using this as a framework.
Since different research studies focus on different aspects of the issue being studied, each article that you read will have different emphases, strengths. In composing a literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews.
It could be from five sources at first year undergraduate level to more than fifty for a thesis. The format of a review of literature may vary from discipline to discipline and from assignment to assignment.
A literature review is a critical analysis of published sources, or literature, on a particular topic. This is an important introductory sentence that will tell your reader what the topic is and the overall perspective or argument you will be presenting.
The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested.
Sage Publications, ; Jesson, Jill. Consider using a table, matrix or concept map to identify how the different sources relate to each other. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue.
A Multimodal and Cultural Approach. Use a variety of academic or scholarly sources that are relevant, current and authoritative. Common Mistakes to Avoid These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature. Sources in your literature review do not clearly relate to the research problem; You do not take sufficient time to define and identify the most relevent sources to use in the literature review related to the research problem; Relies exclusively on secondary analytical sources rather than including relevant primary research studies or data; Uncritically accepts another researcher's findings and interpretations as valid, rather than examining critically all aspects of the research design and analysis; Does not describe the search procedures that were used in identifying the literature to review; Reports isolated statistical results rather than synthesizing them in chi-squared or meta-analytic methods; and, Only includes research that validates assumptions and does not consider contrary findings and alternative interpretations found in the literature.
Use a variety of academic or scholarly sources that are relevant, current and authoritative. A literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis.
A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information.
What is a Literature Review?. Home > Research > Designs > Literature Review Martyn Shuttleworth K reads. It is a summary and synopsis of a particular area of research, allowing anybody reading the paper to establish why you are pursuing this particular research.
A good literature review expands on the reasons behind selecting a. A literature review surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated.
Literature. Summary Review of the Literature Chapter 1 Overview of the Summary Literature Review "Genuine reform," according to David Seeley (), author of Education Through Partnership, "depends on working on relationships -- with the home, community groups, politicians and business." There is a rich history of schools and the public they serve working.
A literature review surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated.
A r c h i v e d I n f o r m a t i o n Studies of Education Reform: Parent and Community Involvement in Education - Summary Review of the Literature.Literature review summary